Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-05-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1289 HB 225 The following, which had been held to today's calendar (page 1271), was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 225 "An Act relating to election campaigns and legislative ethics; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) 2DP 4NR 1259 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (H.JUD) 1260 1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1290 HB 225 Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 225(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 4, line 25, following "(C)": Insert "reasonable" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative James objected. **The presence of Representative Ogan was noted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Absent: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. 1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1291 HB 225 Amendment No. 2 (title amendment) was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 1, line 1: Delete "election campaigns and legislative ethics" Insert "the date after which a person or group may not make a contribution to a candidate; relating to permitted and prohibited uses of public assets and resources under the campaign finance law and the legislative ethics code" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Cowdery objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Murkowski, Phillips, Smalley, Williams Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker Absent: Austerman, Coghill, Kohring, Kookesh, Ogan And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 3, line 24, following "unlimited": Delete "use" Insert "direction" 1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1292 HB 225 Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Cowdery objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Porter, Smalley, Williams Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker Absent: Austerman, Coghill, Kookesh, Ogan And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 3, line 25, following "cards": Insert ", except that seasonal greeting cards may not be mailed for sixty days preceding a state primary or general election" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Kott objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1293 HB 225 CSHB 225(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley, Therriault Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Whitaker, Williams And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 2, line 28, following "activity,": Insert "or for preparation or mailing of seasonal greeting cards," Page 3, lines 24 - 25: Delete all material. Reletter the following subparagraphs accordingly. Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Barnes objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1294 HB 225 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley, Whitaker Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Absent: Kookesh, Masek And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 225(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 225(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 225(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 27 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley Absent: Kookesh And so, CSHB 225(JUD) passed the House. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1999-05-10 House Journal Page 1295 HB 225 Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of her vote on CSHB 225(JUD).